AMERICA IS BETTER THAN THIS!
So, in the Senate today is a bill that, if passed, will be the final blow by the tyrranical administration before the shrub slithers back to Crawford and the rest of his me-too cabinet burst into flames.
Ignoring human rights, constutional freedoms, and the law itself in most cases, the bill is being pushed hard by right-wingers in order to have something to brag about on the campaign trail this weekend besides how many more Iraqis have been blown to bits to date. And what are the yellow-bellied Dems doing about it? Eh...not so much.
Atop the shit list of horrific editions are:
Balkinization sums it up perfectly with:
And here's a little video clip of John Aravosis of AmericaBlog trying to debate some wingnut on CNN over the fact that there's no such thing as allowable torture any more than you can be a little pregnant!!!
In the words of Aravosis, "AMERICA IS BETTER THAN THIS!!!!"
Editions courtesy of WaPo article.
Hat tip to Shakes for the update.
Ignoring human rights, constutional freedoms, and the law itself in most cases, the bill is being pushed hard by right-wingers in order to have something to brag about on the campaign trail this weekend besides how many more Iraqis have been blown to bits to date. And what are the yellow-bellied Dems doing about it? Eh...not so much.
Atop the shit list of horrific editions are:
- the establishment of a court system to prosecute terror suspects, after the Supreme Court had ruled in June that Bush needed Congress' blessing to do so
- the allowance of some trial evidence not usually allowed in regular U.S. courts -- e.g., hearsay evidence would be permitted, as long as a judge finds it to be reliable. Coerced testimony would be allowed in narrow circumstances - generally if a judge finds it reliable and the statement was taken before a 2005 ban on cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment.
- extensive definitions of war crimes such as torture, rape and biological experiments -- provisions intended to protect CIA interrogators from being prosecuted for war crimes when handling terror suspects
- the addition of language that says the president can "interpret the meaning and application" of the Geneva Convention 1949 treaty, which means that although he would not be allowed to authorize interrogation techniques that would violate prohibited war crimes, he would be allowed to decide whether interrogation techniques are within bounds.
Balkinization sums it up perfectly with:
If the Democrats do not stand up to the President on this bill, if they refuse to filibuster it or even threaten to filibuster it, they do not deserve to win any additional seats in the House or in the Senate. They will have delivered a grievous blow to our system of checks and balances, stained America's reputation around the world, and allowed an obscenity to disfigure the American system of law and justice. Far worse than a misguided zealot is the moral coward who says nothing and allows that zealotry to do real harm.Amen, brother!!
And here's a little video clip of John Aravosis of AmericaBlog trying to debate some wingnut on CNN over the fact that there's no such thing as allowable torture any more than you can be a little pregnant!!!
In the words of Aravosis, "AMERICA IS BETTER THAN THIS!!!!"
Editions courtesy of WaPo article.
Hat tip to Shakes for the update.





















